Chapter 19: Myth—Sexuality Doesn’t Matter
Page 104
Factoring in the entire population of Minnesota yields a maximum Gay population of somewhere between .5 to 1%. I believe the same would
be true for all the other states listed. When the entire United States population is factored in, clustered Gay populations are diluted. I personally believe that the real Gay population would fall to a level between .4 to .6 % or very close to the level of populated Gay households. To reach .6 %
would grant a 50% increase in the Gay population over that located in Gay households. This is to say that yet another uncoupled 594,000 Gays are living somewhere else other than in a Gay household. Since it is a proven fact that Gay clusters exist, this type of argument appears specious. Gays
are not evenly distributed in a normal distribution pattern statistically across the United States. That is part of the Gay deception. For example, just because Minneapolis is a hotbed of Gay activity, doesn’t mean that St. Paul or Rochester are. Then think about the voluminous small communities and towns across the country. They would be expected to max out at .1% or less
Gay population. Yes, 1/10th of 1% would be the most you would find in 80- 90% of all small communities.
Yet to get to 1% of the U.S. population requires an extra population of
Gays of 1,720,097 or roughly 150% or 1.5 times the Census Bureau data on the Gay household population. Where are these Gays located? Therefore, despite Gay claims to the contrary, the real Gay population consisting of both homosexuals and lesbians is certainly less than 1% of the total
population of the United States. Yes, Gays believe that strength lies in numbers and that is why they gather in clusters. God commands us not to follow the crowd mentality, but to use righteous judgment at all times.
Now, ask yourself this question. Are homosexuals in the mainstream of society or do they represent a perverted sexual fringe element of society? Should the 99% normal citizens of the United States alter their marriage criteria for the 1% immoral Gay population when it comes to marriage? No!
Woe to the society that does alter the institution that God Himself ordained.
Should we allow the Massachusetts’ Supreme Court to dictate what is now considered marriage? If you factor in the population that approved the
Massachusetts’ and the U.S. Constitution, you could not come up with a more dishonest intellectual conclusion about the framers intentions!
Copyright 2005 Edward G. Palmer, All Rights Reserved. Book of Edward—Chapter 19