Chapter 20: Myth—Politics Doesn’t Matter

Page 15

How morally right is a government policy that taxes moral people when those tax funds are then used for immoral purposes? Imbedded within

such a policy is the distinct fact that it is unjust to the just. How right is a government policy that taxes moral people to support other people, which their own families refuse to support and which they themselves when able simply refuse to work? How just is it to tax people to support discretionary

spending of other individuals and families? Imbedded within these types of government policies is an inherent injustice against moral and righteous people. Same injustice occurs with same sex marriage if you really think about it. There is an injustice imposed on those who are actually moral.

So, what about this question I have heard many times concerning Gay marriage? “How does Gay marriage affect my heterosexual marriage?” The question is usually followed by a quick assertion that “it doesn’t.” Well, let me tell you how it affects heterosexual marriage. If you are following along

sequentially in this book, you’ve learned that abortion is genocide and you cannot predict what will happen generations later by such immoral behavior. You’ve also learned that sexual immorality can have a generational impact on society, which can even result in God abandoning a nation.

Another generational impact on society began when single men and women were allowed to adopt children. Policies ruled that the opposite sex supporting spouse was “not needed anymore” in single parent adoption. At

this point, society abandoned a godly perspective on adoption and parenting. It became a “morality of rights” issue. It was an easy step to then allow two men or two women to adopt. Two Gay parents must be better than one? By Census bureau estimates, at least 166,007 children are now being raised in

Gay households13. Society has “created” Gay families by changing the basis of adoption from “morality” to the “morality of rights.” The next logical step for Gay families is to gain same sex marriage. Yet, this type of policy thinking denies children the moral benefit of both a mother and a father. It

is simpleminded to think children are raised equally well in a one-parent or same-sex coupled household from a societal health perspective. No fault divorce enhanced the adoption trend, as did the birth control “pill” and teen pregnancies. Democrats championed the “morality of rights” transformation

and its attempted destruction of moral valves. The pill, adoption, limitless government supports, etc. were argued as societal “moral rights.”